On March 29, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced two more consent orders containing provisions relating to banks’ third-party risk management programs with respect to banking as a service (BaaS) partnerships.

The terms of the consent orders impose requirements on the banks which include:

  • Ensuring that the bank’s procedures, data, and systems related to third-party relationships and bank activities conducted through third-party relationships include clear lines of authority and responsibility for monitoring adherence to applicable bank procedures, effective risk assessment, timely and accurate reporting, and the development of procedures to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and satisfactory monitoring of implementation and adherence to bank procedures, applicable laws and regulations;
  • Requiring that the board ensure that the bank has reviewed and assessed whether the components of its third-party relationship program are appropriate for the size of the bank, and the nature, scope, complexity, and risk of the bank’s third-party relationships and related bank activities, and satisfactorily ensure that these bank activities are conducted in a safe and sound manner and in compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and
  • Requiring the bank to complete a consumer compliance risk assessment for each third-party relationship conducting and/or performing a bank activity.

These consent orders are the latest in a series of FDIC enforcement actions dealing with third-party risk management programs and fintech partner issues. As discussed here, in February 2024 the FDIC announced a consent order with Tennessee-based Lineage Bank containing similar provisions. We regard this as further indication that the FDIC intends to continue to exert regulatory pressure on its regulated banks who enter into BaaS partnerships without adequate controls in place. As to such banks, we expect that pressure to translate into greater compliance assessment and monitoring requirements imposed by the FDIC, and in turn, their fintech partners.  In response, banks should consider whether their third-party risk management programs are sufficiently rigorous, particularly as they relate to their current BaaS programs and other fintech relationships.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Mark Furletti Mark Furletti

Mark helps clients navigate regulatory risks posed by state and federal laws aimed at protecting consumers and small business, particularly in connection with credit, deposit, and payments products. He is a trusted advisor, providing practical legal counsel and advice to providers of financial

Mark helps clients navigate regulatory risks posed by state and federal laws aimed at protecting consumers and small business, particularly in connection with credit, deposit, and payments products. He is a trusted advisor, providing practical legal counsel and advice to providers of financial services across numerous industries.

Photo of Joseph Reilly Joseph Reilly

Financial services companies depend on Joe for all aspects of their regulatory and compliance needs. Drawing from two decades of experience in the sector, he provides actionable guidance in a complex and evolving landscape.

Photo of Caleb Rosenberg Caleb Rosenberg

Caleb is counsel in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services Practice Group. He focuses his practice on helping federal and state-chartered banks, fintech companies, finance companies, and licensed lenders navigate regulatory risks posed by state and federal laws aimed at protecting consumers and small…

Caleb is counsel in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services Practice Group. He focuses his practice on helping federal and state-chartered banks, fintech companies, finance companies, and licensed lenders navigate regulatory risks posed by state and federal laws aimed at protecting consumers and small businesses in the credit and alternative finance products industry.

Photo of James Stevens James Stevens

James is the co-leader of the firm’s Financial Services Industry Group. He has significant experience working with clients across the entire financial services sector, regularly working with public and private companies such as banks, neobanks, marketplace lenders, and other fintech and financial services…

James is the co-leader of the firm’s Financial Services Industry Group. He has significant experience working with clients across the entire financial services sector, regularly working with public and private companies such as banks, neobanks, marketplace lenders, and other fintech and financial services providers and partners.

Photo of Glen Trudel Glen Trudel

A former bank in-house counsel, Glen brings real-world experience to financial institutions, marketplace lenders, fintechs, and other companies grappling with both regulatory and transactional issues.

Photo of Chris Willis Chris Willis

Chris is the co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services Regulatory practice at the firm. He advises financial services institutions facing state and federal government investigations and examinations, counseling them on compliance issues including UDAP/UDAAP, credit reporting, debt collection, and fair lending, and defending…

Chris is the co-leader of the Consumer Financial Services Regulatory practice at the firm. He advises financial services institutions facing state and federal government investigations and examinations, counseling them on compliance issues including UDAP/UDAAP, credit reporting, debt collection, and fair lending, and defending them in individual and class action lawsuits brought by consumers and enforcement actions brought by government agencies.