On July 16, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) (collectively, the federal banking agencies) jointly published a proposed rule to rescind the 2023 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) final rule. This proposal aims to revert to the CRA framework that was in effect prior to the 2023 amendments, with certain technical updates. This decision follows ongoing litigation in the Fifth Circuit, where banking trade associations challenged the 2023 rule, alleging regulatory overreach.

Background: The 2023 CRA Final Rule

As discussed here, the CRA, established in 1977, was designed to ensure that banks meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income areas, while maintaining safety and soundness. The 2023 CRA final rule was intended to modernize the assessment of lenders’ compliance, encouraging banks to expand access to credit and adapt to changes in the banking industry, such as mobile and online banking. Despite these intentions, the rule faced criticism for not addressing nonbank lenders and credit unions, and for altering the CRA performance evaluation process in ways that some argued did not align with the law.

Proposed Rescission and Return to 1995 CRA Regulations

The federal banking agencies have proposed to rescind the 2023 CRA final rule and revert to the 1995 CRA regulations, with updated provisions to reflect inflation adjustments for 2025.

These updated provisions include:

  • The definition of “small bank” is updated to include those with assets of less than $402 million as of December 31 of either of the prior two calendar years. “Intermediate small banks” are defined as those with assets between $402 million and $1.609 billion. “Large banks” are those with assets over $1.609 billion. These thresholds are critical for determining the appropriate CRA performance tests and standards applicable to each bank category.
  • Amendments to align asset-size thresholds with inflation adjustments, based on the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index. The asset-size thresholds set forth in this proposed rule are accurate through December 31, 2025, as detailed in the relevant Federal Register notices and OCC bulletins. By incorporating inflation adjustments, the agencies aim to provide a stable and predictable regulatory environment that reflects the economic realities faced by banks.
  • Different methods for evaluating a bank’s CRA performance based on its asset size and business strategy. Small banks are primarily evaluated under a lending test, with the potential to receive an “outstanding” rating based on their retail lending performance. Intermediate small banks undergo both a lending test and a community development test, which evaluates all community development activities combined. Large banks are subject to separate lending, investment, and service tests, requiring annual reporting of data on community development loans, small business loans, and small farm loans. This comprehensive evaluation framework ensures that banks of all sizes are assessed fairly and consistently, promoting transparency and accountability in meeting community credit needs.

Request for Comments

The agencies are seeking feedback on all aspects of the proposed rule. Comments must be submitted within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Gregory Parisi Gregory Parisi

Greg leverages his broad experience and pragmatic approach, bringing a wealth of knowledge, business insight and practical problem-solving skills to efficiently manage transactions and advise clients in an evolving legal landscape. He combines his corporate and transactional experience with a robust knowledge of…

Greg leverages his broad experience and pragmatic approach, bringing a wealth of knowledge, business insight and practical problem-solving skills to efficiently manage transactions and advise clients in an evolving legal landscape. He combines his corporate and transactional experience with a robust knowledge of bank regulatory issues to provide valued legal solutions for financial institutions, financial technology companies and other businesses. Greg often works closely with clients to design and implement internal policies and procedures and contractual safeguards in commercial arrangements in connection with corporate and regulatory requirements and risk management best practices.

Photo of Lori Sommerfield Lori Sommerfield

With over two decades of consumer financial services experience in federal government, in-house, and private practice settings, and a specialty in fair lending regulatory compliance, Lori counsels clients in supervisory issues, examinations, investigations, and enforcement actions.

Photo of James Stevens James Stevens

James is the co-leader of the firm’s Financial Services Industry Group. He has significant experience working with clients across the entire financial services sector, regularly working with public and private companies such as banks, neobanks, marketplace lenders, and other fintech and financial services…

James is the co-leader of the firm’s Financial Services Industry Group. He has significant experience working with clients across the entire financial services sector, regularly working with public and private companies such as banks, neobanks, marketplace lenders, and other fintech and financial services providers and partners.