Bank Regulatory

Subscribe to Bank Regulatory via RSS

On November 5, the Federal Reserve Board announced that it had finalized revisions to its Large Financial Institution (LFI) rating system and the Insurance Supervisory Framework that change when a firm is considered “well managed” and recalibrated the enforcement stance tied to weaker component ratings. Under the new approach, a firm with at least two component ratings of Broadly Meets Expectations or Conditionally Meets Expectations and no more than one Deficient-1 will be deemed “well managed.” The Board also replaces the automatic presumption of an enforcement action for one or more Deficient-1 ratings with a case-by-case determination, while retaining a presumption of formal action for any Deficient-2. The Insurance Supervisory Framework was updated to remove a reference to reputational risk. The changes become effective 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. Governor Michael Barr dissented, warning the rule lowers safeguards and conflicts with statutory “well managed” requirements.

At The Clearing House Annual Conference, Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould outlined an agency-wide strategy to defend and promote federal preemption across the banking system. As reported by Law360, he emphasized pairing court advocacy with public- and policymaker-facing engagement to rebuild political support that he said has eroded over the past 15 years.

Monday, November 10, 2025

Register Here

James Stevens, partner and co-leader of Troutman Pepper Locke’s Financial Services Industry Group, will present “Bank Partnerships and Banking‑as‑a‑Service: New Pressure and New Opportunities” at Practising Law Institute’s Banking Law Institute 2025 on Monday, November 10, 2025. This daylong advanced-level CLE program will cover recent developments impacting the…

Troutman Pepper Locke’s Securities Investigations + Enforcement Practice

Troutman Pepper Locke’s Securities Investigations and Enforcement team counsels and defends clients through all stages of securities enforcement proceedings. Our attorneys have served in key government agencies and regulatory bodies, and bring their insight to bear in each representation. The team includes a former branch chief of…

On October 8, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), in collaboration with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the National Credit Union Administration, released a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) concerning Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). These FAQs aim to clarify regulatory requirements related to SARs, assisting financial institutions in fulfilling their compliance obligations while optimizing resources for activities that provide the greatest value to law enforcement and other government users of Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) reporting.

On October 7, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) unveiled two significant notices of proposed rulemaking (NPRs) designed to reshape the regulatory landscape for financial institutions. The first NPR aims to eliminate the use of reputation risk as a basis for regulatory actions, thereby reducing subjectivity in supervisory programs. This proposed rulemaking responds to concerns expressed in Executive Order 14331, Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans, that the use of reputation risk can be a pretext for restricting law-abiding individuals’ and businesses’ access to financial services on the basis of political or religious beliefs or lawful business activities. The second NPR seeks to establish a clear definition of “unsafe or unsound practice” and revise the framework for issuing Matters Requiring Attention (MRAs) and other supervisory communications, with a focus on material financial risks. As of now, “unsafe or unsound practice” is not defined in the statute.

On October 6, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced a series of significant actions aimed at reducing the regulatory burden on community banks. These initiatives are part of the OCC’s ongoing efforts to tailor its regulatory and supervisory frameworks, thereby promoting economic growth and allowing community banks to better serve their…

On September 30, 2025, the new Texas Stock Exchange (TXSE) announced that the SEC approved its Form 1 registration statement, officially approving the exchange. Accordingly, the TXSE is now officially a recognized national securities exchange, similar to the Nasdaq Stock Market and the New York Stock Exchange, both of which the TXSE has expressly targeted as its main competitors in past public statements. In the TXSE’s own words, this makes it the “first fully integrated national securities exchange to receive SEC approval in decades” offering, within a single platform, a comprehensive suite of services, including listing standards, trading, clearing, settlement, and market data.

On September 26, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Paul S. Atkins announced a return to the SEC’s prior practice of allowing individuals and entities facing enforcement actions to request that the SEC simultaneously consider both their settlement offers and any related waiver requests. Waivers may be necessary to avoid automatic disqualifications and collateral consequences that can result from enforcement actions, such as the loss of well-known seasoned issuer status, safe harbor protections, private offering exemptions, or the ability to serve in certain regulated capacities.