Photo of Helen Lee

Helen Lee

Subscribe to Helen Lee's Posts

Helen is a trusted advisor to financial institutions and fintech companies. Her 15+ years of large firm and in-house experience uniquely positions her to provide practical, business-minded advice to help clients navigate a wide range of regulatory and compliance concerns.

Contact:Read more about Helen Lee

On December 16, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) proposed a new rule that would create a formal, bank‑centric process for issuing payment stablecoins. The rule is designed to implement the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (the GENIUS Act) and would apply to FDIC‑supervised institutions, state nonmember banks and state savings associations, that want to issue payment stablecoins through a subsidiary. With this proposed rule, the FDIC is seeking to “evaluate the safety and soundness of an applicant’s proposed activities based on consideration of statutory factors and support the responsible growth and use of digital assets and related technologies while minimizing the regulatory burden on applicants.”

On October 7, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) unveiled two significant notices of proposed rulemaking (NPRs) designed to reshape the regulatory landscape for financial institutions. The first NPR aims to eliminate the use of reputation risk as a basis for regulatory actions, thereby reducing subjectivity in supervisory programs. This proposed rulemaking responds to concerns expressed in Executive Order 14331, Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans, that the use of reputation risk can be a pretext for restricting law-abiding individuals’ and businesses’ access to financial services on the basis of political or religious beliefs or lawful business activities. The second NPR seeks to establish a clear definition of “unsafe or unsound practice” and revise the framework for issuing Matters Requiring Attention (MRAs) and other supervisory communications, with a focus on material financial risks. As of now, “unsafe or unsound practice” is not defined in the statute.

On October 6, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced a series of significant actions aimed at reducing the regulatory burden on community banks. These initiatives are part of the OCC’s ongoing efforts to tailor its regulatory and supervisory frameworks, thereby promoting economic growth and allowing community banks to better serve their…

On September 8, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) took significant action to “depoliticize” the federal banking system by issuing two bulletins to banks that further the goals of Executive Order 14331 “Guaranteeing Free Banking for All Americans” (discussed here). The OCC’s press release announcing the bulletins explains that they are aimed at eliminating politicized or unlawful debanking practices and ensuring that banks provide access to financial services based on objective, risk-based analyses rather than political or religious beliefs. Bulletin 2025-22 clarifies how politicized or unlawful debanking will be assessed in licensing applications and Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) performance evaluations. Bulletin 2025-23 reminds banks of their legal obligations under the Right to Financial Privacy Act (RFPA) to protect customer financial records and ensure proper use of Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs).

On March 20, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) announced that it will no longer examine its regulated institutions for reputation risk. According to the OCC’s “Categories of Risk,” reputation risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from negative public opinion, which can affect an institution’s ability to establish new relationships or services or to continue servicing existing relationships. The decision to stop examining banks for reputation risk comes in the wake of the introduction of the Financial Integrity and Regulation Management (FIRM) Act, which aimed to eliminate reputational risk as a component of the supervision of depository institutions.