Bank Regulatory

Subscribe to Bank Regulatory via RSS

In a recent decision, the Delaware Court of Chancery held on summary judgment that a borrower’s grant of a security interest in substantially all of its assets, including its rights under a license agreement, constituted an “assignment” or “transfer” of such rights that triggered the license agreement counterparty’s contractual right of first negotiation (ROFN) and right of first refusal (ROFR). The decision has implications beyond the pharmaceutical licensing context in which it arose, and should prompt careful review of transfer restriction provisions in any agreement where a party may later seek to pledge its contractual rights as collateral.

FinCEN has issued an order granting exceptive relief from the longstanding requirement that covered financial institutions (CFIs) identify and verify the beneficial owners of legal entity customers every time a new account is opened. CFIs now need to collect and verify beneficial ownership information once per customer and then update it only when risk or new information warrants. While CFIs must still comply with all other Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and anti-money laundering and counter-financing terrorism (AML/CFT) obligations, the new order represents an easing of the requirements established by FinCEN’s Customer Due Diligence regulation (the 2016 CDD rule) regarding the diligence CFIs must perform on legal entity customers as part of AML/CFT programs. Companies should consider whether it makes sense to maintain stricter past compliance practices or revise current policies to fit the new rules based on an individualized risk assessment.

In 2025, the U.S. digital asset landscape evolved more dramatically than in any year since the industry’s inception. A pro‑innovation White House, an active Congress, and key regulators — including the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Department of…

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking aimed at clarifying the permissible activities of national trust banks. The proposal seeks to amend chartering regulations to explicitly state that national trust companies may engage in nonfiduciary activities, such as asset custody, without being required to obtain a full-service national bank charter. However, the proposed rule does not address what specific nonfiduciary activities are permissible, nor does it indicate whether a national trust company must engage in a minimum level of fiduciary activities.

This article was republished in Law360 on March 13, 2026.

On December 16, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) proposed a new rule that would create a formal, bank‑centric process for issuing payment stablecoins. The rule is designed to implement the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act (the GENIUS Act) and would apply to FDIC‑supervised institutions, state nonmember banks and state savings associations, that want to issue payment stablecoins through a subsidiary. With this proposed rule, the FDIC is seeking to “evaluate the safety and soundness of an applicant’s proposed activities based on consideration of statutory factors and support the responsible growth and use of digital assets and related technologies while minimizing the regulatory burden on applicants.”

On December 17, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) proposed new guidance that would significantly streamline how community banks elect to be evaluated under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) by providing a simplified strategic plan form. Framed as part of Comptroller Gould’s broader initiative to reduce regulatory burden on community banks, the proposal would make the strategic plan option more accessible, more predictable, and less resource‑intensive for smaller institutions.

On October 29, the Federal Reserve’s Division of Supervision and Regulation issued a Statement of Supervisory Operating Principles that formalizes Vice Chair for Supervision Miki Bowman’s August direction to reset how the Fed supervises banks. The goal of this action is to strengthen supervision by focusing on identifying and acting early on the most important risks to safety and soundness, using proportionate, timely measures. This represents a significant change from prior practice, moving away from process-heavy supervision and toward judgment-driven oversight.