Following the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) litigation brought against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) in 2024,[1] on February 5, 2025, the FDIC released hundreds of pages of documents related to its supervision of banks that engaged in, or sought to engage in, crypto-related activities during the last administration. Acting Chairman Hill’s decision to release these documents reflected “a commitment to enhance transparency, beyond what is required by the [FOIA], while also attempting to fulfill the spirit of the FOIA request.”[2]

We are pleased to share with you our latest publication, “Navigating Change: First 100 Days under the Trump Administration,” authored by our Digital Assets + Blockchain team. This retrospective examines the pivotal developments in the digital assets industry during the initial phase of the Trump administration.

Chapter 7 bankruptcy, often referred to as “liquidation bankruptcy,” involves the systematic liquidation of a business debtor’s assets by a bankruptcy trustee, with the proceeds distributed to creditors. This process signifies the end of the business partner for creditors, although occasionally, the trustee may operate the business briefly to sell assets as a going concern. While Chapter 7 shares similarities with Chapter 11, such as the automatic stay and claim filing deadlines, it presents unique challenges and opportunities for creditors.

Understanding the differences between receivership and bankruptcy is crucial for businesses facing financial distress. A receivership involves the appointment of an independent third party by a court to manage and preserve a business’s assets, primarily to maximize the value of the secured lender’s collateral. In contrast, bankruptcy generally benefits the borrower who has become insolvent and is governed by the Bankruptcy Code, allowing existing management to maintain control and potentially discharge debts.

The Treasury Department has taken initial steps to implement the Trump administration’s “total elimination” policy directed at certain drug trafficking cartels. Most recently, on May 1, Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued an alert advising about a rising trend of oil smuggling from Mexico across the U.S. border led by several cartels.

On April 10, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Corporation Finance (the Division) issued a statement aimed at providing greater clarity on the application of federal securities laws to crypto assets. These offerings may involve equity or debt securities of issuers whose operations relate to networks, applications, and/or crypto assets. The offerings may also relate to crypto assets offered as part of or subject to an investment contract (such a crypto asset, a “subject crypto asset”). The statement does not modify or amend existing rules, but instead tries to translate the traditional disclosure requirements for the unique realities of the crypto asset universe. Notably, the statement also does not address whether or not crypto assets are deemed securities for purposes of federal securities laws, rather, the statement addresses disclosure requirements for those issuers offering crypto assets as part of or subject to an investment contract.

For companies in financial distress, retaining key employees during a Chapter 11 restructuring can be crucial for success. Key Employee Retention Plans (KERPs) and Key Employee Incentive Plans (KEIPs) are tools used to incentivize employees to stay and perform. KERPs are typically designed for non-insider employees and offer bonuses tied to restructuring milestones, while KEIPs target senior management with performance-based bonuses. Both plans aim to mitigate the uncertainty and disruption of working at a company in bankruptcy.